Questions: Alpha Decay and Tunneling Through the Coulomb Barrier

5 questions to test your understanding

Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice

Nucleus A emits alpha particles with 5 MeV kinetic energy and has a half-life of 10,000 years. Nucleus B has a similar structure but emits alphas at 6 MeV. What should you expect for nucleus B's half-life?

ASlightly shorter — perhaps around 8,000 to 9,000 years, since 6 MeV is only modestly higher
BDramatically shorter — possibly many orders of magnitude shorter — due to the exponential sensitivity of the Gamow factor
CLonger — higher-energy alphas face a wider effective barrier because of larger Coulomb repulsion
DEssentially the same — a 20% energy increase has a small effect on a quantum-mechanical process
Question 2 Multiple Choice

Why can't classical mechanics account for alpha decay in heavy nuclei?

AClassical mechanics doesn't include the strong nuclear force, so it cannot model nuclear binding
BThe alpha particle's kinetic energy (4–9 MeV) is less than the Coulomb barrier height (~25–30 MeV), so classically the alpha is permanently trapped inside the nucleus
CClassical mechanics predicts too fast a decay rate, since it allows the alpha to bounce off the barrier indefinitely
DClassical mechanics cannot handle Coulomb interactions at the femtometer scale
Question 3 True / False

The Geiger-Nuttall law — which shows that alpha-decay half-lives span 25 orders of magnitude while emitted alpha energies vary by only a factor of two — is a direct consequence of the exponential sensitivity of tunneling probability to the Gamow factor.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 4 True / False

Uranium-238 and polonium-212 have vastly different half-lives (4.5 billion years vs. 300 nanoseconds) because they decay by fundamentally different nuclear mechanisms.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 5 Short Answer

Why does a small increase in the kinetic energy of the emitted alpha particle produce such a dramatic decrease in the nucleus's half-life?

Think about your answer, then reveal below.