In the conditional statement 'If a triangle has three equal sides, then it is equilateral,' what is the hypothesis?
AIt is equilateral
BA triangle has three equal sides
CAll triangles are equilateral
DIf a triangle has three equal sides
In 'If P, then Q,' the hypothesis (antecedent) is P — the part after 'if' and before 'then.' Here, P = 'a triangle has three equal sides.' The conclusion (consequent) is Q = 'it is equilateral.' The hypothesis is the condition that triggers the conclusion.
Question 2 True / False
The conditional statement 'If 5 > 10, then the moon is made of cheese' is logically false.
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: False
This statement is logically true. A conditional P → Q is false only when P is true and Q is false. Here, P ('5 > 10') is false, so the conditional is vacuously true regardless of Q. This feels strange because neither part is factually true, but logical truth of a conditional depends on the relationship between P and Q's truth values, not on their real-world content.
Question 3 Short Answer
Explain in your own words why a conditional statement is considered true when its hypothesis is false, using a real-world analogy.
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Think of a promise: 'If it snows, I will cancel school.' On a sunny day, the promise has not been broken — the condition was never triggered. The promise is only broken when it snows AND school is not cancelled. Similarly, P → Q is only false when P is true and Q is false; when P is false, the 'promise' is intact.
The promise analogy captures why vacuous truth makes sense: a conditional is a guarantee about what happens when the hypothesis holds. If the hypothesis never holds, the guarantee cannot be violated. You can only break the rule 'If P then Q' by finding a case where P is true and Q is false.