How does conflict theory differ from functionalist theory in explaining why social inequality persists across generations?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Functionalism argues inequality persists because it serves social functions — differential rewards motivate people to fill important, demanding roles (Davis-Moore thesis). Conflict theory argues inequality persists because dominant groups actively use power, ideology, and coercion to reproduce their advantages, not because inequality is functionally necessary. What functionalism calls 'functional,' conflict theory calls 'legitimation of domination.'
The disagreement is about whether existing social arrangements serve society as a whole or primarily the interests of those on top. Conflict theory insists the question of 'who benefits?' must always be asked, and the answer is typically the dominant group — which is why change requires challenging power, not just reforming individuals.