Why is the 'maximal' qualifier in the definition of a connected component essential? What would go wrong without it?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Without maximality, every point would belong to many different connected subsets (including singletons, intervals, and the whole component), and there would be no unique 'piece' associated with a point. Maximality forces each point into exactly one piece: its component is the union of all connected sets containing it, and since that union is itself connected, it is the unique largest connected subset containing x. Without maximality, we could not define a partition — points would belong to overlapping connected sets with no canonical choice.
The definition works because the union of connected sets sharing a common point is connected. This means the union of all connected subsets through x is still connected, and it is maximal by construction — no larger connected set contains it without being it. Dropping 'maximal' would lose the partition property that makes connected components useful for classifying spaces into distinct pieces.