Why does the order of a permutation equal the LCM of its cycle lengths rather than the sum or product? Explain the reasoning in terms of what 'order' means.
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: The order of a permutation is the smallest number of times you must apply it for every element to return to its starting position. Each disjoint cycle operates independently on its own set of elements. A k-cycle returns to the identity after exactly k applications. For all cycles to simultaneously return to their starting positions, you need a number of applications that is a multiple of each cycle length — the smallest such number is the LCM. The sum has no such interpretation, and the product is generally too large.
This is a direct consequence of how disjoint cycles interact (or rather, don't interact). Because they act on separate elements, each cycle's 'reset time' is independent. You need to wait until ALL cycles have simultaneously completed whole numbers of rotations — that's the definition of LCM. A concrete check: for (1 2 3)(4 5), after 3 steps the first cycle resets but the second hasn't (it needs 2 or 4 steps to reset); after 2 steps the second resets but the first hasn't; after LCM(3,2)=6 steps, both reset simultaneously.