Questions: Fluorescence Quantum Yield and Excited State Lifetime

5 questions to test your understanding

Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice

Molecule A has Φ_f = 0.05 and τ = 2 ns. Molecule B also has Φ_f = 0.05 but τ = 40 ns. What can you conclude?

ABoth molecules have the same non-radiative decay rate, since their quantum yields are equal
BMolecule A has fast non-radiative decay (large k_nr), while molecule B emits slowly (small k_r) — both are dim for different reasons
CMolecule B is a better fluorophore because its longer lifetime makes it more useful in all applications
DMolecule A has a smaller radiative rate constant k_r than molecule B
Question 2 Multiple Choice

A newly synthesized fluorophore has a quantum yield of only 0.03 under physiological conditions. The most likely explanation is:

AThe molecule absorbs photons only weakly, leaving little energy available for emission
BNon-radiative decay pathways (molecular vibrations, rotations, or energy transfer) compete effectively with fluorescence
CThe molecule emits photons at a wavelength that is reabsorbed by the surrounding solvent
DThe molecule has a very short natural radiative lifetime τ₀, forcing rapid emission before excited-state population builds
Question 3 True / False

A molecule with a high fluorescence quantum yield necessarily has a long excited-state lifetime.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 4 True / False

Measuring both fluorescence quantum yield and excited-state lifetime for the same molecule provides enough information to independently calculate k_r and k_nr.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 5 Short Answer

Why do rigid aromatic fluorophores like fluorescein tend to have much higher quantum yields than flexible molecules with many rotatable bonds?

Think about your answer, then reveal below.