Questions: Gravity Potential Theory and Earth's Gravitational Field
3 questions to test your understanding
Score: 0 / 3
Question 1 Multiple Choice
Which equation governs the gravitational potential U in a region that contains matter with density ρ?
A∇²U = 0 (Laplace's equation)
B∇²U = −4πGρ (Poisson's equation)
Cg = −∇²U
D∇U = −4πGρ
Poisson's equation ∇²U = −4πGρ applies wherever mass is present (ρ ≠ 0). Laplace's equation ∇²U = 0 is the special case when ρ = 0 — i.e., in mass-free regions such as the air above the ground. The gravity field vector is recovered from the potential as g = −∇U (the negative gradient), not the Laplacian.
Question 2 True / False
A gravity anomaly observed at Earth's surface can arise mainly from density variations in the upper crust, not from deeper mantle structure.
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: False
Gravity anomalies integrate the effect of all density contrasts along the entire vertical column beneath the measurement point. Deep density variations — such as thickened oceanic crust, subducting slabs, or mantle plumes — can produce measurable gravity anomalies at the surface. The challenge of gravity interpretation is precisely that signals from different depths superimpose, making it an underdetermined inverse problem.
Question 3 Short Answer
Explain the conceptual difference between the forward problem and the inverse problem in gravity interpretation.
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: The forward problem predicts the surface gravity field produced by a given (assumed) density distribution in the subsurface. The inverse problem works backwards: given observed surface gravity data, it seeks to recover the subsurface density distribution that could explain those observations. The inverse problem is non-unique — many different density models can fit the same gravity data — so additional constraints (e.g., seismic or borehole data) are needed.
Forward modeling is deterministic and always has a unique solution: a specified density model produces one and only one gravity field. The inverse is ill-posed because gravity measurements lose information about depth — a shallow low-density body and a deeper high-density body can produce the same surface anomaly. This non-uniqueness is a fundamental challenge in all potential-field geophysics.