What makes situational irony different from mere coincidence? Give an example that illustrates the distinction.
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Situational irony requires a meaningful conceptual gap between expectation and outcome — the reversal must illuminate something about the character, theme, or situation. Coincidence is random. A fire station burning down is situationally ironic because the institution designed to prevent fires cannot prevent its own destruction. Rain on a wedding day is coincidence unless the narrative has made fair weather symbolically meaningful.
The test is interpretive significance. Ask: does the gap between expected and actual outcome reveal something, or is it merely unexpected? If the reversal exposes a contradiction in a character's values, a theme's logic, or a social institution's claims, it is situational irony. If it is simply unexpected, it is coincidence.