Why can't we define open sets in a general topological space by saying 'a set is open if every point has a positive distance to the boundary'?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: A general topological space may have no notion of distance at all. Open sets are defined purely by membership in the collection τ satisfying three axioms (containing ∅ and X, closed under arbitrary unions, closed under finite intersections), which requires no metric.
The distance-to-boundary characterization works in metric spaces (like ℝⁿ) where d(x, boundary) > 0 captures open sets perfectly. But topology was developed precisely to study spaces where distance is absent or irrelevant — function spaces, quotient spaces, abstract manifolds. The axiomatic definition via τ captures the essential 'neighborhood' structure without needing a metric.