Why is orientation required for integration of differential forms? What goes wrong without it?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Integration of an n-form on an n-manifold involves choosing local coordinates, computing the integral in coordinates, and patching together via a partition of unity. The change-of-variables formula introduces a factor of |det(Jacobian)|, but differential forms naturally transform by det(Jacobian) without the absolute value. If the manifold has charts with both positive and negative Jacobian determinants (incompatible orientations), the contributions from different charts can cancel instead of adding up, giving inconsistent results. An orientation ensures all transition maps have positive Jacobian determinant, making the signs consistent.
On an oriented manifold, the integral ∫_M ω is well-defined and changes sign if you reverse the orientation. On a non-orientable manifold, you can integrate densities (which transform by |det J|) but not differential forms. This is why Stokes' theorem requires oriented manifolds — the boundary orientation must be compatible with the interior orientation.