Questions: Photosynthesis in Bacteria and Cyanobacteria
5 questions to test your understanding
Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice
Purple sulfur bacteria can photosynthesize and grow in the light but do not produce oxygen. Why not?
AThey lack chlorophyll and therefore cannot drive the energetically demanding water-splitting reaction
BThey use hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) rather than water as their electron donor, so they never split water or release O₂
CThey have only one photosystem, which produces insufficient energy to drive any oxidation reaction
DThey perform photosynthesis in anaerobic environments where oxygen would immediately react with sulfide
The key difference between anoxygenic and oxygenic photosynthesis is the electron donor. Purple sulfur bacteria oxidize H₂S → elemental sulfur (or H₂, or organic compounds), extracting electrons without ever splitting water. Since water-splitting is the only source of O₂ in biological photosynthesis, these organisms produce no oxygen. Option A is incorrect — bacteriochlorophyll efficiently absorbs light energy; the constraint is the electron source, not the pigment. Option C is partially true (they use one photosystem) but the real reason is the electron donor, not energy insufficiency.
Question 2 Multiple Choice
What made the evolution of cyanobacteria so ecologically transformative compared to the anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria that preceded them?
ACyanobacteria absorbed light more efficiently, outcompeting anoxygenic bacteria and occupying a broader range of habitats
BCyanobacteria evolved the Z-scheme — two linked photosystems — enabling them to use water as an electron donor and release O₂, transforming Earth's atmosphere
CCyanobacteria were the first organisms to fix CO₂, inventing carbon fixation where none had existed before
DCyanobacteria evolved cell walls that protected them from the UV radiation previously responsible for limiting bacterial photosynthesis
The Z-scheme — Photosystem II and Photosystem I working in series — was the innovation that made oxygenic photosynthesis possible. PSII has sufficient oxidizing power to strip electrons from water (a very stable molecule), releasing O₂. A single photosystem (as in anoxygenic bacteria) lacks the energy to oxidize water; two photosystems working in series provide enough. The accumulated O₂ output triggered the Great Oxidation Event (~2.4 Gya), rusting dissolved iron from the oceans, transforming atmospheric chemistry, and establishing the oxygen-rich environment that all aerobic life depends on.
Question 3 True / False
Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria — the purple and green sulfur bacteria — are evolutionarily more ancient than cyanobacteria and dominated Earth's photic zone for over a billion years before oxygen-producing photosynthesis evolved.
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: True
This is correct. Life existed for over a billion years before the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. During this time, anoxygenic phototrophs dominated, and Earth's atmosphere was reducing — essentially devoid of free oxygen. Cyanobacteria evolved around 2.7 Gya (with their full ecological impact from ~2.4 Gya onward), fundamentally changing the planet. This history matters for understanding the origin of chloroplasts: plant chloroplasts derive from cyanobacteria via endosymbiosis, not from the earlier anoxygenic bacteria.
Question 4 True / False
Plant chloroplasts perform photosynthesis using fundamentally different molecular machinery from cyanobacteria, because they evolved independently within the eukaryotic lineage.
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: False
Chloroplasts did not evolve independently — they are the descendants of ancient cyanobacteria that were engulfed by a eukaryotic host cell through endosymbiosis. Over evolutionary time, most cyanobacterial genes were transferred to the nuclear genome or lost, but the core photosynthetic machinery — including Photosystem I, Photosystem II, the cytochrome b₆f complex, and ATP synthase — is directly homologous between cyanobacteria and plant chloroplasts. Modern cyanobacteria and chloroplasts use the same Z-scheme, the same pigments (chlorophyll a), and essentially the same protein complexes. The endosymbiotic origin is why they are so similar.
Question 5 Short Answer
Explain why two linked photosystems (the Z-scheme) are required for oxygenic photosynthesis but not for anoxygenic photosynthesis.
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Water is a very stable molecule with a high oxidation potential — stripping electrons from it requires delivering very high-energy, strongly oxidizing 'electron holes.' A single photosystem can generate enough energy to oxidize easier electron donors like H₂S or H₂, but not enough to oxidize water. The Z-scheme solves this by using two photons in series: Photosystem II generates the strong oxidant needed to split water, producing low-energy electrons that then pass through an electron transport chain to Photosystem I, which uses a second photon to boost these electrons to the high-energy state needed to reduce NADP⁺. Two sequential light-driven reactions achieve what one cannot.
This is the fundamental constraint distinguishing oxygenic from anoxygenic photosynthesis. Thermodynamically, the oxidation of water (E° = +0.82 V) requires a much stronger oxidizing agent than the oxidation of H₂S (E° ≈ −0.23 V). PSII generates an exceptionally strong oxidant (E° ≈ +1.1 V) specifically to accomplish water-splitting — the strongest biological oxidant known. Anoxygenic bacteria, using only one photosystem, can generate moderately strong oxidants sufficient for H₂S or H₂ but fall far short of the oxidizing power needed for water.