How does the choice between first-person and third-person limited narration change the interpretive work a reader must do?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: Both modes restrict information to one consciousness, but first-person embeds the narrator inside the story as a participant whose credibility and motives can be questioned directly. Third-person limited creates more distance — the narrator is not a character — so the reader evaluates the focal character's perceptions without simultaneously evaluating the narrator as a person. First-person invites questions about why the narrator is telling the story and what they might be omitting or distorting.
This difference matters because first-person narrators have stakes in the story that can motivate unreliability, rationalization, or selective memory. Third-person limited narrators can still be biased through free indirect discourse, but the source of that bias is the focalized character's worldview rather than a narrator's self-interest.