Questions: Quantum Tunneling Through Rectangular Barriers
5 questions to test your understanding
Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice
Barrier A has width d and transmission probability T₀. Barrier B is identical but has width 2d. Using the approximation T ≈ e^(−2κd), what is the transmission probability through barrier B?
AT₀/2, because doubling the width halves the transmission
BT₀², because doubling the width doubles the exponent, squaring the probability
C2T₀, because the particle has twice as far to travel and thus passes through more slowly
D0, because a barrier twice as wide is classically impenetrable and quantum effects vanish
T ≈ e^(−2κd), so for width 2d: T_B ≈ e^(−2κ·2d) = e^(−4κd) = (e^(−2κd))² = T₀². Doubling the width squares the probability — this is the exponential sensitivity that makes tunneling so sharply dependent on geometry. This is why the STM can resolve individual atoms: a 1 Å change in tip-surface distance changes the tunneling current by roughly a factor of 10.
Question 2 Multiple Choice
A particle with energy E = 0.8 eV approaches a rectangular barrier of height V₀ = 1.0 eV. What form does the wavefunction take inside the barrier, and why?
AOscillatory (sinusoidal), because the particle still has positive total energy
BA plane wave, because the particle propagates through the barrier at reduced speed
CReal exponentials (growing and decaying), because kinetic energy is negative inside the barrier
DZero everywhere inside the barrier, because the particle cannot enter a classically forbidden region
Inside the barrier, E < V₀, so the kinetic energy E − V₀ is negative. The Schrödinger equation becomes d²ψ/dx² = κ²ψ where κ = √(2m(V₀−E))/ℏ. This has real exponential solutions Ce^(κx) + De^(−κx), not sinusoidal ones. The decaying exponential (De^(−κx)) is the key: it fades toward the far side but remains nonzero for finite width d, allowing nonzero amplitude — and thus nonzero transmission probability — on the other side. Option A applies when E > V₀ (above-barrier transmission).
Question 3 True / False
A particle that tunnels through a rectangular barrier emerges on the far side with less energy than it had before, because some energy was 'used up' penetrating the barrier.
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: False
Energy is conserved in quantum tunneling. The transmitted particle has exactly the same energy E as the incident particle — it did not gain or lose energy crossing the barrier. What changes is the probability amplitude: most of the wavefunction reflects back and only a fraction transmits. The transmitted fraction still carries the original energy. The barrier does not absorb energy; it is a potential energy landscape that the particle propagates through.
Question 4 True / False
The tunneling transmission probability is exponentially sensitive to barrier width, meaning a small increase in barrier width produces a disproportionately large decrease in transmission probability.
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: True
T ≈ e^(−2κd) is exponentially decreasing in d. Adding even a small increment Δd multiplies T by e^(−2κΔd), which can be very small. This exponential sensitivity is not just a mathematical fact — it is physically exploited in the scanning tunneling microscope, where a ~1 Å change in tip-surface distance changes the tunneling current by about an order of magnitude, enabling atomic-resolution imaging.
Question 5 Short Answer
Why doesn't the wavefunction simply drop to zero at the boundary of a classically forbidden region?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: The Schrödinger equation requires that both ψ and its derivative dψ/dx are continuous across any boundary. If ψ were forced to zero at the boundary, continuity would require the wavefunction to approach zero from the incoming side as well, which contradicts the non-zero incident wavefunction. Instead, ψ smoothly transitions into an exponentially decaying form inside the barrier, consistent with the boundary conditions on both sides.
The matching conditions at the boundary — continuity of ψ and dψ/dx — are what make tunneling possible. They prevent an abrupt cutoff and force the wavefunction to 'leak' into the classically forbidden region. This is the mathematical origin of tunneling: not a violation of the Schrödinger equation, but a direct consequence of it combined with the requirement that solutions must be smooth.