Why does the choice of Riemannian metric matter so much, given that every smooth manifold admits one?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: While existence is guaranteed, different metrics produce completely different geometric structures: different notions of distance, different geodesics, different curvature, different volume. A sphere with the round metric has positive curvature and finite diameter; with a flat metric (impossible globally, but illustrative locally) it would have zero curvature. The metric determines all of Riemannian geometry — connections, curvature, geodesics, the Laplacian — so choosing the 'right' metric for a given problem is the central question. In general relativity, the metric encodes the gravitational field.
The partition-of-unity construction proves existence but gives a 'generic' metric with no particular geometric significance. Interesting Riemannian geometry comes from metrics with special properties: constant curvature (spheres, hyperbolic space), Einstein metrics (Ricci curvature proportional to metric), Kahler metrics (compatible with complex structure). Finding metrics with prescribed curvature properties is one of the deepest problems in differential geometry.