5 questions to test your understanding
A student scans a line of iambic pentameter and finds a spondee (DUM-DUM) in the third foot where an iamb is expected. She marks it as a mistake and tries to reread the line to 'fix' it. What is wrong with her approach?
What is the interpretive significance of the gap between a poem's base meter and the actual stresses of a given line?
Scansion is a prescriptive tool: its purpose is to show where a line's syllable stresses should fall according to the established metrical pattern.
Two competent readers who scan the same line differently may both be right, and that ambiguity can itself be meaningful.
Why is it insufficient to simply mark which syllables are stressed and unstressed in a line? What additional interpretive step does scansion require?