Using a Venn diagram or set reasoning, explain why A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C).
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: An element x is in A ∩ (B ∪ C) when x ∈ A and x ∈ B ∪ C. The second condition means x ∈ B or x ∈ C. Case 1: x ∈ A and x ∈ B, so x ∈ A ∩ B. Case 2: x ∈ A and x ∈ C, so x ∈ A ∩ C. Either way, x ∈ (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C). The reverse inclusion works similarly. This is the distributive law: intersection distributes over union.
This identity is the set-theoretic version of the distributive law in algebra (a × (b + c) = a×b + a×c) and in logic (P ∧ (Q ∨ R) ≡ (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R)). The parallel between sets, algebra, and logic reinforces that these are the same structural relationships appearing in different mathematical contexts.