Questions: Standardized and Adjusted Rates

5 questions to test your understanding

Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice

Florida has a crude heart disease mortality rate of 35 per 1,000; Alaska has 18 per 1,000. After age-standardization using the U.S. national population, the rates are nearly equal. What is the correct interpretation?

AThe age-standardized rates reveal the true mortality rates in each state
BFlorida's health system is performing equally to Alaska's since standardized rates are equal
CThe crude rate difference was largely explained by Florida's older age structure, not higher age-specific disease rates
DAge-standardization removed confounders other than age, explaining the gap
Question 2 Multiple Choice

A researcher studying mortality in a small occupational cohort of 200 workers finds too few deaths in each age group to calculate stable age-specific rates. Which standardization approach is appropriate?

ADirect standardization — apply the cohort's age-specific rates to a national standard population
BIndirect standardization — apply national age-specific rates to the cohort's age structure, then compare observed to expected deaths
CCrude rate comparison, since standardization requires stable age-specific rates
DDirect standardization using the cohort's own age distribution as the standard
Question 3 True / False

An age-standardized mortality rate of 22 per 1,000 means that 22 out of most 1,000 people in that population actually died from the cause during the study period.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 4 True / False

The choice of standard population can affect the magnitude of age-standardized rates and occasionally their relative ordering across populations being compared.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 5 Short Answer

Why can't you use an age-standardized mortality rate to estimate the actual number of deaths that will occur in a population next year?

Think about your answer, then reveal below.