Questions: Tangent Planes and Linear Approximation
5 questions to test your understanding
Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice
For z = f(x,y) with f(1, 2) = 5, fₓ(1, 2) = 3, and f_y(1, 2) = −1, what does the linear approximation give for f(1.1, 1.9)?
Az ≈ 5 + 3(0.1) + (−1)(−0.1) = 5.4
Bz ≈ 5 + 3(1.1) + (−1)(1.9) = 6.4
Cz ≈ 3(0.1) + (−1)(−0.1) = 0.4
Dz ≈ 5 + 3(0.1)(−0.1) = 4.97
The tangent plane formula is L(x,y) = f(a,b) + fₓ(a,b)(x − a) + f_y(a,b)(y − b). Here (a,b) = (1,2), so x − a = 1.1 − 1 = 0.1 and y − b = 1.9 − 2 = −0.1. L = 5 + 3(0.1) + (−1)(−0.1) = 5 + 0.3 + 0.1 = 5.4. Option B plugs in the raw values of x and y instead of the displacements from (a,b) — a very common error. Option C forgets to add the base value f(a,b). Option D multiplies the displacements together rather than weighting them by their partial derivatives.
Question 2 Multiple Choice
A student claims: 'The tangent plane to f(x,y) at (a,b) is horizontal if and only if both fₓ(a,b) = 0 and f_y(a,b) = 0. So the tangent plane only exists at critical points where the plane happens to be horizontal.' What is the error?
AThe tangent plane exists everywhere f is continuous, not just where it is differentiable
BThe tangent plane exists wherever f is differentiable — critical points are where the plane happens to be horizontal, but the plane exists at all differentiable points
CThe tangent plane exists only at saddle points, not at local extrema
DThe tangent plane requires fₓ = f_y = 0 to be well-defined, so the student is correct
The first sentence is correct: the tangent plane is horizontal when both partial derivatives vanish, which defines a critical point. But the student's conclusion is wrong. The tangent plane exists at every point where f is differentiable — it just has a nonzero tilt whenever the gradient is nonzero. Critical points are the special cases where the tangent plane is horizontal; they are not the only places where a tangent plane exists. This is exactly analogous to the tangent line in single-variable calculus: it exists wherever f is differentiable, and it's horizontal wherever f'(a) = 0.
Question 3 True / False
If both partial derivatives fₓ(a,b) and f_y(a,b) exist at a point, then the tangent plane formula gives a valid linear approximation to f near (a,b).
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: False
Existence of partial derivatives is necessary but not sufficient for differentiability. Partial derivatives measure slopes along the coordinate axes only; a function can have both partial derivatives at a point yet behave wildly in diagonal directions. Differentiability requires the linear approximation error to vanish faster than distance from (a,b) in all directions — a stronger condition. A sufficient condition is that the partial derivatives are continuous at (a,b). Without continuity of partials (or some equivalent condition), the tangent plane formula may not actually approximate f well near the point.
Question 4 True / False
The gradient vector ∇f(a,b) = (fₓ(a,b), f_y(a,b)) contains all the information needed to specify the tangent plane's orientation, given also the base value f(a,b).
TTrue
FFalse
Answer: True
The tangent plane z = f(a,b) + fₓ(a,b)(x − a) + f_y(a,b)(y − b) is determined by exactly three pieces of information: the base value f(a,b) and the two components of the gradient. The gradient encodes the plane's tilt: the directional derivative in direction u equals ∇f · u, so the slope of the plane in any direction is read directly from the gradient. Once you know the gradient and the base point, the plane is fully specified — its orientation, its slope in every direction, and its height at (a,b).
Question 5 Short Answer
Why is the tangent plane useful for error propagation — estimating how uncertainty in inputs x and y translates to uncertainty in the output f(x,y)?
Think about your answer, then reveal below.
Model answer: The tangent plane is the best linear approximation to f near (a,b), so for small deviations Δx and Δy the change in f is approximately Δz ≈ fₓ·Δx + f_y·Δy. Each partial derivative acts as a sensitivity coefficient: fₓ scales how much uncertainty in x contributes to output uncertainty, and f_y scales the y contribution. Because the approximation is linear, uncertainties add independently — you can compute worst-case or statistical combinations of input uncertainties to bound the output uncertainty. This converts a complicated nonlinear function into a linear formula valid near the operating point.
The key is that the partial derivatives fₓ and f_y are the rates at which the output responds to each input. Near the operating point, the response is linear in the input deviations. This is why engineers use tangent planes (differentials) for tolerance analysis — not because the function is exactly linear, but because linear is a good enough approximation for small uncertainties, and linear calculations are tractable.