Questions: Voice Leading: Avoiding Parallel Fifths and Octaves

5 questions to test your understanding

Score: 0 / 5
Question 1 Multiple Choice

In four-part writing, the soprano moves from C5 to D5 while the bass moves from G3 to A3 simultaneously. Is this a voice-leading violation?

ANo — the voices are moving in different octaves, so the interval doesn't apply
BNo — only inner voices are subject to the parallel fifths rule
CYes — C-G and D-A are both perfect fifths, and moving through them in parallel reduces harmonic independence
DYes — any parallel motion in contrary registers is prohibited
Question 2 Multiple Choice

A student argues: 'Parallel thirds and parallel fifths are essentially the same — both are just two voices moving in the same direction by the same interval size, so they should have the same effect.' How would you evaluate this argument?

ACorrect — parallel motion of any interval tends to weaken voice independence equally
BIncorrect — parallel thirds blend warmly without fusing voices, while parallel fifths cause acoustic fusion that destroys independence; the rule is specific to perfect intervals
CIncorrect — parallel thirds are actually more problematic because thirds are closer together
DCorrect — both are avoided in strict counterpoint for the same acoustic reason
Question 3 True / False

Parallel octaves between the soprano and bass are a voice-leading error, but parallel octaves between inner voices (alto and tenor) are generally acceptable in four-part writing.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 4 True / False

The acoustic reason parallel perfect fifths reduce harmonic independence is that the 3:2 frequency ratio of a perfect fifth causes two voices moving in parallel through such intervals to fuse perceptually rather than remain distinct.

TTrue
FFalse
Question 5 Short Answer

Why are parallel thirds acceptable in voice leading when parallel perfect fifths are not? What acoustic property distinguishes them?

Think about your answer, then reveal below.