A compound inequality combines two inequalities using "and" or "or." An "and" compound inequality (e.g., −3 < x < 7, or equivalently x > −3 AND x < 7) has solutions that satisfy both conditions simultaneously — the intersection. An "or" compound inequality (e.g., x < −2 OR x > 5) has solutions that satisfy at least one condition — the union. On a number line, "and" produces a segment between two values, while "or" produces two rays pointing outward. Compound inequalities model real-world constraints like temperature ranges, acceptable measurements, and eligibility criteria.
Solve each part of the compound inequality separately, then combine on a number line. For "and" inequalities, practice the shorthand notation (−3 < x < 7) and solving all three parts simultaneously. For "or" inequalities, emphasize that the solution is everything in either region. Use interval notation as an alternative representation. Test values to verify solutions.
You already know how to solve a single inequality — you isolate the variable and flip the sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative. A compound inequality simply chains two of those constraints together and asks: when are both (or at least one) true at the same time?
The word "and" means intersection: both conditions must hold simultaneously. If a thermometer must read above 0°C but below 100°C to register liquid water, that is an "and" statement — 0 < T < 100. On a number line, this looks like a segment with two endpoints: you shade only the region between the two boundaries. When you solve a three-part inequality like −3 < 2x + 1 < 7, you are really solving two inequalities at once: 2x + 1 > −3 and 2x + 1 < 7. The efficient approach is to operate on all three parts simultaneously — subtract 1 from all three, then divide all three by 2 — keeping the variable trapped in the middle.
The word "or" means union: either condition is enough. If a machine shuts off when the temperature is too low (below −10°C) or too high (above 80°C), the shutdown condition is an "or" statement. On a number line, this produces two rays pointing outward from the two boundary values, with a gap in the middle. Note that an "or" solution set is always at least as large as an "and" solution set — it can never be narrower.
A useful sanity check: if an "and" compound inequality forces x to be simultaneously greater than 7 and less than 3, that is an empty set — no number satisfies both at once, and the solution is "no solution." Conversely, if an "or" compound inequality gives x < 10 or x > 2, you should recognize that every real number satisfies at least one condition, giving the solution "all real numbers." These edge cases reveal the underlying logic: "and" can collapse to nothing, and "or" can expand to everything.