Crater morphology transitions from simple (raised rim, bowl-shaped) to complex (central peak, terraced walls) above a size threshold that depends on surface gravity. Craters degrade through slumping, isostatic adjustment, erosion, and volcanic infilling, with degradation rates varying by planetary environment.
From your study of impact cratering mechanics, you know that a hypervelocity impact releases enormous energy, excavating a transient cavity that is much larger than the impactor itself. The morphology of the final crater — the shape that persists after the impact event — depends on how the target material responds to that excavation, and this response is governed by crater size, surface gravity, and the mechanical properties of the target rock.
Simple craters are the smallest category: clean, bowl-shaped depressions with raised rims and smooth interior walls. On the Moon, simple craters range up to about 15 kilometers in diameter. The transient cavity produced by the impact is roughly preserved because the crater walls are strong enough to support themselves. Above a critical diameter — the simple-to-complex transition — gravity overwhelms the strength of the crater walls. The rim collapses inward along concentric faults, forming terraced walls, and the crater floor rebounds upward as the compressed rock beneath the impact point relaxes, producing a central peak. This rebound is analogous to the central jet you see when you drop a stone into water, but in rock moving at geological timescales during the seconds to minutes of crater modification. On higher-gravity bodies, the transition occurs at smaller diameters: about 15 km on the Moon, but only 2–4 km on Earth, because stronger gravitational forces cause walls to collapse sooner. The very largest impacts produce multi-ring basins where concentric rings of mountains surround a broad, flat floor — structures like the Orientale Basin on the Moon that record impacts so energetic that the lithosphere itself flexed and fractured.
Once formed, craters begin to degrade immediately, and the rate and style of degradation depend entirely on the planetary environment. On the Moon, which lacks an atmosphere, running water, and plate tectonics, degradation is extraordinarily slow. Lunar craters degrade primarily through micrometeorite bombardment (which gradually rounds rims and fills interiors with regolith), occasional larger impacts that deposit ejecta across older craters, and slow isostatic adjustment as the lithosphere relaxes under the crater's mass deficit. A fresh lunar crater retains sharp rims and bright ejecta rays for hundreds of millions of years. On Mars, degradation is faster: wind erosion rounds rims, aeolian sediment fills floors, and ancient water erosion has carved channels into crater walls and deposited layered sediments inside craters like Gale and Jezero. On Earth, degradation is most rapid of all — weathering, erosion, vegetation, sedimentation, and plate tectonics can obliterate craters entirely within tens of millions of years, which is why only about 200 confirmed impact structures are known on Earth despite billions of years of bombardment.
The state of degradation of a crater is therefore a powerful diagnostic tool. On airless bodies, the degree of rim sharpness, ejecta preservation, and superimposed small crater density allows planetary scientists to assign relative ages — a fresh, sharp-rimmed crater overlying a degraded, filled one is unambiguously younger. This principle underlies crater counting, the primary method for dating planetary surfaces. On bodies with atmospheres and active geology, the style of degradation reveals the processes that have operated: fluvial channels on crater rims indicate past liquid water, volcanic fills record episodes of volcanism, and wind-sculpted features record atmospheric activity. Understanding crater morphology and degradation thus connects impact physics to surface geology, geochronology, and the environmental history of planetary bodies throughout the solar system.