Vizing's Theorem states that the chromatic index of any simple graph is either Δ or Δ+1, where Δ is maximum degree. Graphs achieving Δ are Class 1; those needing Δ+1 are Class 2. Despite this tight characterization, determining class membership is NP-hard in general.
Examine Class 1 graphs (bipartite graphs are always Class 1) and Class 2 graphs (odd cycles, complete odd cliques) to see patterns in edge structure.
Not all graphs are Class 1; many require Δ+1 colors despite the tight bound. Determining class membership is computationally hard.
From edge coloring, you know that the chromatic index χ'(G) is the minimum number of colors needed to color the edges of G so that no two edges sharing a vertex receive the same color. The trivial lower bound is immediate: if a vertex has degree Δ (the maximum degree in the graph), all Δ edges at that vertex must receive different colors, so χ'(G) ≥ Δ. The question is how much higher than Δ we might need to go.
Vizing's Theorem gives a striking answer: never more than Δ + 1. For any simple graph with maximum degree Δ, the chromatic index is either exactly Δ or exactly Δ + 1 — nothing else is possible. This pins χ'(G) to one of just two values, a remarkably tight classification given that Δ alone tells you almost nothing about the graph's global structure. Graphs achieving χ'(G) = Δ are called Class 1; those requiring χ'(G) = Δ + 1 are called Class 2. Every simple graph falls into exactly one class.
The Class 1/Class 2 distinction has satisfying examples on both sides. Bipartite graphs are always Class 1 — this follows from König's edge-coloring theorem, which shows that Δ colors always suffice for bipartite graphs. Complete graphs on an even number of vertices (K_{2n}) are also Class 1, since their edges decompose into exactly Δ perfect matchings. On the Class 2 side, odd cycles need 3 colors for maximum degree 2, since the odd cycle forces color conflicts. Complete graphs on an odd number of vertices (K_{2n+1}) are also Class 2, because the odd vertex count prevents a clean Δ-coloring.
The frustrating twist is that despite knowing χ'(G) is Δ or Δ+1, determining which one applies is computationally hard — deciding whether a graph is Class 1 is NP-complete in general. This mirrors the situation with Hamiltonian cycles: the theorem gives a beautifully precise characterization, but computing which case applies is intractable in the worst case. In scheduling applications, where edges represent tasks sharing a resource and colors represent time slots, Vizing's theorem provides the key practical guarantee: you will never need more than Δ + 1 time slots, regardless of graph structure. That upper bound is what makes the theorem immediately useful even before you know whether your specific graph is Class 1 or Class 2.