In steady-state growth, all variables grow at constant rates and the capital-output ratio remains constant. With Cobb-Douglas production and constant rates of population growth (n) and technological progress (g), the economy grows at n + g. The steady-state capital-output ratio depends on the savings rate, depreciation rate, and parameters of the production function. Deviations from steady-state generate dynamics toward convergence.
From the Solow model you already know, the key insight is that capital accumulation alone cannot drive permanent growth — diminishing returns ensure that the economy approaches a steady state where capital per effective worker stops changing. The balanced growth path formalizes what that steady state looks like when we allow population and technology to grow continuously. On this path, nothing is accelerating or decelerating; every important ratio has settled to a constant.
To see why growth rates must be n + g in steady state, think about what "steady state" means for capital per effective worker, k̃ = K/(A·L). For k̃ to remain constant, K must grow at the same rate as A·L. Since A grows at g and L grows at n, the product A·L grows at n + g. So total capital K grows at n + g. By the Cobb-Douglas production function, output Y also grows at n + g — same rate. Consumption and investment likewise grow at n + g. The capital-output ratio K/Y stays constant because both numerator and denominator grow at the same rate. This is the hallmark of balanced growth: all aggregate variables march in lockstep at n + g, while per-worker variables grow at g alone.
The steady-state capital-output ratio itself depends on the model's parameters. From the capital accumulation equation, at steady state savings must exactly cover depreciation and the "dilution" from new workers and better technology: s·Y = (δ + n + g)·K. Dividing both sides by Y gives K/Y = s/(δ + n + g). A higher savings rate raises the steady-state capital-output ratio; faster depreciation, population growth, or technological progress lowers it. This formula is useful because it pins down the long-run capital intensity without solving a differential equation.
What happens when the economy is *off* the balanced growth path? If k̃ is below its steady-state value — perhaps after a war destroys capital — savings exceeds break-even investment, so k̃ rises. The economy grows *faster* than n + g temporarily, catching up to the balanced path from below. If k̃ is above steady state (say, after a temporary savings surge), break-even investment exceeds savings and k̃ falls back. This convergence property means the balanced growth path acts like an attractor: regardless of where an economy starts, it tends toward the same long-run trajectory determined by s, δ, n, g, and the production function. Cross-country income differences in this model thus reflect either different parameter values or different positions on the convergence path — not fundamentally different growth mechanisms.