Human factors and ergonomics (HFE) is the scientific discipline concerned with understanding human capabilities and limitations and applying that understanding to the design of systems, equipment, tasks, and environments to optimize human well-being and overall system performance. The field spans physical ergonomics (biomechanics, workstation design, musculoskeletal disorders), cognitive ergonomics (mental workload, decision-making, human-computer interaction), and organizational ergonomics (work system design, communication, teamwork). A central principle is that systems should be designed to fit human users rather than requiring humans to adapt to poorly designed systems — because when the design does not match human capabilities, errors, injuries, and inefficiency are the predictable result.
Human factors and ergonomics occupies a unique position within I-O psychology: it bridges the gap between psychology and engineering, applying knowledge about human perception, cognition, and physical capabilities to the practical design of work systems. Where other I-O topics focus on selecting, motivating, and managing people within existing systems, HFE focuses on designing systems that are compatible with the humans who use them.
The physical ergonomics branch addresses the biomechanical aspects of work. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) — back injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, tendinitis — are the most common and costly occupational injuries, driven by repetitive motion, awkward postures, excessive force, and vibration. Physical ergonomics applies anthropometric data (measurements of human body dimensions), biomechanical models, and physiological research to design workstations, tools, and tasks that minimize physical strain. Principles like adjustable furniture, proper display placement, tool design that maintains neutral wrist positions, and task rotation to vary physical demands all derive from this research.
Cognitive ergonomics deals with mental processes — perception, attention, memory, decision-making — and how they interact with system design. Display design principles (proximity compatibility, signal detection theory applications, alarm design) ensure that information is presented in ways that match human perceptual capabilities. Mental workload research establishes that performance degrades when cognitive demands exceed capacity (overload) or fall below a minimum level (underload/vigilance problems). Decision support systems, automation, and interface design all draw on cognitive ergonomics to keep human operators in a performance zone where their cognitive resources are appropriately challenged but not overwhelmed.
The study of human error is perhaps the most consequential application of human factors. Reason's influential framework distinguishes slips and lapses (execution failures where the intention was correct but the action went wrong) from mistakes (planning failures where the intention itself was wrong). Reason's Swiss cheese model of accidents shows that catastrophic failures result from the alignment of multiple system vulnerabilities — each layer of defense (training, procedures, equipment design, supervision) has "holes," and accidents occur when the holes align. This systemic view of error has transformed safety thinking in aviation, healthcare, nuclear power, and other high-reliability industries, shifting the focus from individual blame to system redesign.
The organizational ergonomics branch connects HFE to the broader I-O psychology domain, addressing how work is organized, how teams are structured, and how communication systems support (or undermine) effective performance. Macroergonomics (Hendrick) examines the design of the overall work system — organizational structure, job design, scheduling, communication networks — recognizing that local ergonomic improvements (a better chair, a clearer display) can be overwhelmed by system-level problems (understaffing, poor communication, impossible schedules). This whole-system perspective makes HFE relevant not just to equipment design but to the organizational design questions that define I-O psychology.
No topics depend on this one yet.